Ihor Todorov
Doctor of History, Full Professor, Department of International Studies and Public Communications,
Uzhhorod National University
ORCID 0000-0003-0986-9485
DOI 10.37837/2707-7683-2020-31
Abstract. The article examines Ukrainian-Hungarian relations against the background of Hungary’s three-year-long veto on meetings of the NATO-Ukraine Commission. The author outlined the origins and essence of the current conflict between Ukraine and Hungary after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine ‘On Education’ in September 2017. Hungary believed that Ukraine had violated the rights of the Hungarian national minority as well as several international and bilateral agreements. Throughout the years of Ukraine’s independence, the Hungarian ethnic minority in Transcarpathia has enjoyed the internationally recognised right to study in their mother tongue from primary school to university. This conflict is the reason why Hungary has vetoed meetings of the NATO-Ukraine Commission. The law was sent to the Venice Commission for expert legal assessment, but its recommendations did not reduce tensions between Kyiv and Budapest. They still have different interpretations of the opinion of the Venice Commission. The Alliance called on the parties to resolve the dispute bilaterally without taking it to the NATO level, but numerous bilateral talks at the level of foreign ministers, ministers of education, and representatives of national minorities did not bear fruit. Based on an examination of Hungary’s official statements, the author claims that the government is determined to protect the national minority by all legal means at the political and diplomatic levels.
The article emphasises that both countries could implement joint projects in the fields of energy, regional security, environment, and combating transnational threats. Ukraine and Hungary are part of one region. Promoting cooperation and maintaining general agreement within its boundaries can significantly expand the capabilities of both countries and give them an opportunity to keep the conflict under control.
Keywords: Ukrainian-Hungarian relations, NATO-Ukraine Commission, Euro-Atlantic integration of Ukraine, Law of Ukraine ‘On Education’.
References
1. Artemov, I. (2009). Transkordonne spivrobitnytstvo v yevrointehratsiinii stratehii Ukrainy: Monohrafiia [Cross-Border Cooperation in Ukraine’s Eurointegration Strategy]. Uzhgorod: Lira. [in Ukrainian]
2. Kish, Ye. (2013). Try dominanty v politychnii palitri Uhorshchyny [Three Dominant Features of Hungarian Political Spectrum]. Strategic Panorama, no. 1-2, pp. 85-99. [in Ukrainian]
3. Ustych, S. et al. (2017). Istoriia, shcho obiednuie. Narysy novitnoho transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva u Karpatskomu rehioni [The Unifying History. Essays on the Modern Cross-Border Cooperation in the Carpathian Region]. Uzhhorod: DVNZ ‘UzhNU’. [in Ukrainian]
4. Lozovyi, V. (2019). Suchasna humanitarna polityka Uhorshchyny: vyklyky dlia Ukrainy [Hungary’s Modern Humanitarian Policy: Challenges for Ukraine]. [online] Available at: https://niss.gov.ua/doslidzhennya/gumanitarniy-rozvitok/suchasna-gumanitarna-politika-ugorschini-vikliki-dlya-ukraini [in Ukrainian]
5. Mitriaieva, S. (2013). Systema pidtrymky zakordonnykh spivvitchyznykiv v krainakh Karpatskoho Yevrorehionu: pryklad Uhorshchyny [The System of Supporting Expatriate Communities in Carpatian Countries: The Example of Hungary]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk, no. 76, pp. 63-67.
6. Tkach, D. (2014). Suchasna Uhorshchyna v konteksti suspilnykh transformatsii: Monohrafiia [Modern Hungary in the Context of Social Transformations: Monograph]. Kyiv: Instytut politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy.
7. Ustych, S. (ed.). (2018). Empirychne sotsiolohichne doslidzhennia transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva u Karpatskomu rehioni: Monohrafia [Empirical Sociological Study of Cross-Border Cooperation in the Carpathian Region: Monograph]. Uzhgorod: DVNZ ‘UzhNU’.
8. ‘Serhii Sydorenko: Konflikt mizh Ukrainoiu i Uhorshchynoiu ne vyrishytsia naiblyzhchym chasom’ (2018), UA: Ukrainian Radio, 3 September [online] Available at: http://nrcu.gov.ua/news.html?newsID=81245 https://coolyanews.info/sergiij-sidorenko-ugors-kij-uryad-nazivaie-ukrayins-kij-osviitniij-zakon-napiivfashists-kim.html [in Ukrainian]
9. Turzanskyi, D. (2017-2020). Dmytro Tuzhanskyi: politoloh [online]. Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/authors/tuzanskiy/ [in Ukrainian]
10. Tkach, D. (2009). Ukrainsko-uhorski vidnosyny novitnoi doby [Ukrainian-Hungarian Relations of the Modern Era]. Naukovyi visnyk Dyplomatychnoi akademii Ukrainy, Issue 15, p. 80.
11. Ibid.
12. Dohovir pro osnovy dobrosusidstva ta spivrobitnytstva mizh Ukrainoiu i Uhorskoiu Respublikoiu (1992). [Treaty on the Basis of Good Neighbourhood and Cooperation between Ukraine and the Republic of Hungary]. [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/348_004 [in Ukrainian]
14. Osvita.ua (2011). Plan politychnykh reform shchodo vstupu Uhorshchyny v NATO. Referat [online]. Available at: https://osvita.ua/vnz/reports/politolog/16082/ [in Ukrainian]
15. NATO (2018). NATO’s Science for Peace and Security Programme: sixty years old, still going strong [online] Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/news_160936.htm?selectedLocale=en [in English]
16. Actmedia (2019). B9 Summit Declaration: importance of NATO forward presence from Baltic Sea to Black Sea [online]. Available at: https://www.actmedia.eu/daily/b9-summit-declaration-importance-of-nato-forward-presence-from-baltic-sea-to-black-sea/79831 [in English]
17. Zakon Ukrainy ‘Pro osvitu’ (2017). [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19 [in Ukrainian]
18. Shepa, Kh. (2020). Zakarpattia i Uhorshchyna: tysiacholittia razom [online] Available at: https://ua.kiszo.net/2020/03/09 [in Ukrainian]
19. NATO (2018). Brussels Summit Declaration [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/official_texts_156624.htm?selectedLocale=uk [in English]
20. Kulakov, A. (ed.). (2017). Words and wars: Ukraine facing Kremlin propaganda. Kyiv: KIS.
21. Parafianowicz, Z. (2018). ‘Szijjártó: Na Ukrainie trwa antywęgierska nagonka’, Gazeta prawna.pl, 30 October [online]. Available at: https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/1326208,na-ukrainie-trwa-antywegierska-nagonka.html [in Polish]
22. Tuzhanskyi, D. (2020). ‘Kompromis zarady NATO: shcho mozhe zminyty zustrich Zelenskoho ta Orbana’, Yevropeiska pravda, 13 January [online]. Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2020/01/13/7105017/ [in Ukrainian]
23. ‘Posla Uhorshchyny vyklykaly u MZS Ukrainy cherez zaiavy pro blokuvannia diialnosti komisii Ukraina – NATO’ (2019), Radio Svoboda, 3 December [online]. Available at: https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-ugorshchyna-mzs/30304593.html [in Ukrainian]
24. Ukrainska pryzma (2019). Dyplomatychni pidsumky 2019 roku [online]. Available at: http://prismua.org/2019-12-20/ [in Ukrainian]
25. Zakon Ukrainy ‘Pro povnu zahalnu seredniu osvitu’ (2020). [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/463-20 [in Ukrainian]
26. Tuzhanskyi, D. (2020). ‘Ukraina-Uhorshchyna: eksperty rozpovily pro prychyny “natiahnutykh” vidnosyn ta shliakhy vyrishennia problem, – UP’, Holos Karpat, 13 January [online]. Available at: https://goloskarpat.info/analytics/5e1cc09f2f41b/ [in Ukrainian]
27. Tuzhanskyi, D. (2020). ‘Piat prychyn dlia Uhorshchyny: chomu ta yak Budapesht zminiuie taktyku shchodo Ukrainy’, Yevropeiska pravda, 18 February [online] Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/articles/2020/02/18/7106497/ [in Ukrainian]
28. ‘Siiiarto u Kyievi domovyvsia, yak orhanizuvaty zustrich Orbana i Zelenskoho’ (2020), Yevropeiska Pravda, 7 February [online] Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2020/02/7/7106097/ [in Ukrainian]