The Fulfillment of Nationwide Interests of Post-War Germany in the Dimension of ‘Chancellor Democracy’

  • Post category:Issue XXII

Andrii Kudriachenko
Doctor of History, Full Professor, Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine, Director of the State Institution “Institute of World History of the NAS of Ukraine”

DOI: 10.37837/2707-7683-2021-4

Abstract. Summing up the modern course of events regarding political leadership in Germany and on the basis of activities of eight chancellors, the author contends the following: The decisive factor in ascension to the political Olympus is the affiliation with either of the two parties, the SPD or the CDU/CSU union, with the nominee’s leadership qualities and political acumen playing an essential role. Even if these conditions are met, the contender’s choice of situation and time where these qualities would be sought after is quite important. It was the political developments of a certain historical era that became an imperative for some politicians to take the reins of power and use them to the full extent. Indeed, at turning points in the history of the Federal Republic, the most crucial decisions were prepared at the German Chancellery and made unilaterally by the chancellor. The author of the article emphasises that chance cannot be ruled out. To become a successful leader in Germany, the much-needed person must be in the right place at the right time. Proof of that is the example of German federal chancellors.
The political landscape, democratic footing, and well-structured state and political set-up have enabled only two political parties, the CDU/CSU and the SPD, to nominate from their ranks those who could become national leaders of their historical epoch. The basis of ‘chancellor democracy’ as a system of state and political power has never impeded but enabled such ascension for outstanding personalities. Quite a few of them have become some sort of fathers of the nation. Able leadership that has benefited national interests and fitted into the plane of German development prospects has defined the personal success of both political figures and public officials of national scope.
Keywords: Federal Republic of Germany, federal chancellor, political landscape, SPD, CDU/CSU.

Download Article (ukr)

1. Kudriachenko, A. (2020). Federatyvna Respublika Nimechchyna: zasady demokratychnoho skhodzhennia [The Federal Republic of Germany: The Principles of Democratic Ascent]. Kyiv: Fenix. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2000). Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany]. December, p. 89. [in German].
3. Siwert-Probst, J. (1998). ‘Die Klassischen Aussenpolitischen Institutionen’ [The Classic Foreign Policy Institutions], in Eberwein, W.-D., Kaiser, K. (eds). Deutschlands neue Aussenpolitik, Band 4. Institutionen und Ressoursen [Germany’s New Foreign Policy, Volume 4. Institutions and Resources]. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, p. 14. [in German]. 10.1515/9783486829303.13
4. Meriam Echoul (2015). Liste der Bundeskanzler seit 1949 [online]. Available at: [in German].
5. Vorobyeva, L. (2000). Vneshnyaya politika FRG na poroge XXI veka [Foreign Policy of the FRG on the Threshold of the 21st Century]. Moscow: Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, p. 66. [in Russian].
6. Baring, A., Schölgen, G. (2002). Kanzler, Krisen, Koalitionen [Chancellor, Crises, Coalitions]. Berlin: Siedlir Verlag, pp. 12–13. [in German].
7. Griffith William, E. (1981). Die Ostpolitik der Bundespolitik Deutschland [The Ostpolitik of Federal Politics in Germany]. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta Verlag, pp. 79–80. [in German].
8. Bühler, W. (ed.). (1993). Die Adenauer Ära. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1963 [The Adenauer Era. The Federal Republic of Germany 1949–1963]. Munich; Zurich: Piper. [in German].
9. Deutsche Welle (2008). ‘Nimetski portrety: Konrad Adenauer’, 21 November [online]. Available at: [in Ukrainian].
10. Zaritskii, B. (1997). Liudwig Erkhard. Sekrety ekonomicheskogo chuda [Ludwig Erhard. The Secrets of Economic Wonder]. Moscow: Bek. [in Russian].
11. Leitenberger, V. (1986). Ludwig Erhard. Der Nationalökonom als Politiker [Ludwig Erhard. The Economist as a Politician]. Göttingen: Muster-Schmidt. [in German].
12. Pavlov, V. (2011). Politicheskoye liderstvo v usloviyakh ‘kantslerskoy demokratii’ [Political Leadership in a ‘Chancellor’s Democracy’]. Mirovaya ekonomika i miezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, Issue 11, p. 31. [in Russian].
13. Patrushev, A. (2009). Germanskiye kantslery ot Bismarka do Merkel [German Chancellors from Bismarck to Merkel]. Moscow: Moscow University Press, p. 374. [in Russian].
14. Kempf, U., Merz, H. (eds). (2001). Kanzler und Minister 1949–1998. Biografisches Lexikon der deutschen Bundesregirungen [Chancellor and Minister 1949–1998. Biographical lexicon of the German federal governments]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, p. 374. [in German].
15. Kudriachenko, op. cit.
16. Endlich am Ziel – und weiter unterwegs [online]. Available at: [in German].
17. Timoshenkova, Ye. (2014). Vybory v germanskiy parlament: osnovnyye resultaty i ikh vliyaniye na partiyno-politicheskuyu sistemu Germanii. Germaniya. 2013 [Elections to the German Parliament: Main Results and Their Impact on the Party and Political System of Germany. Germany. 2013]. Doklady Instituta Yevropy RAN, no. 304, pp. 34–50. Available at: [in Russian].
18. Kudriachenko, op. cit., p. 340.
19. Meriam Echoul, op. cit.