Stance of European Intellectuals on russia’s Aggression against Ukraine

Stepan Vidnianskyi
Doctor of History, Full Professor, Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine, Head of the Department of History of International Relations and Foreign Policy of Ukraine, Institute of History of Ukraine of the NAS of Ukraine

DOI: 10.37837/2707-7683-2022-31

Abstract. The article analyses the stance of prominent European intellectuals on the brutal military aggression against Ukraine, a sovereign European country, unleashed by russia, a terrorist-state, which challenged all the democratic values of the Western civilisation and brought humanity to the brink of World War III. In their public appearances, publications and civil engagement, the most prominent representatives of European elites have influenced considerably the European public perception of putin’s war against Ukraine. To wit, Germans Jürgen Habermas and Martin Schulze Wessel, French Françoise Thom and Jonathan Littell, Belgian Bart De Baere, Czech Jan Rychlík, the world-renowned American historian Timothy Snider, and other intellectuals firmly believe that not just putin, but also all russians are responsible for the war, having supported his criminal aggression. Moreover, they believe that Europeans should show utmost support to Ukraine, which is not just fighting against the aggressor for the sake of its existence, freedom, democracy, and pro-European choice, but also against totalitarianism for the sake of the future of Europe.
The author stresses that the Euro-Atlantic civilisation needs to unite in combating russia’s aggressive and insidious attempts at imposing on Europe, through its loyal foreign politicians, experts, and institutions, its desired perspective on the russian-Ukrainian war and, in general, Ukrainian history and culture. The author outlines three primary objectives of European intellectuals. The first lies in conveying the truth about the russian-Ukrainian war of 2014–22, its causes, and geopolitical implications, real and potential, to society. The second focuses on refuting russian deceitful propaganda. The third involves shedding light on the essence, components, and historical roots of ‘ruscism’, the dominant totalitarian ideology of contemporary russia, which poses a threat to the existence of the human civilisation and demands urgent attention and elimination.
Keywords: russia, Ukraine, aggression, Europe, intellectuals, public opinion.

Download Article (ukr)

References
1. Kyslytsia, S. (2022). ‘Vystup Nadzvychainoho i Povnovazhnoho Posla na zasidanni Rady Bezpeky OON’, Ukrainska Pravda, 23 June [online]. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2022/06/23/7354232/ [in Ukrainian].
2. Prysedska, V. (2022). ‘“Tse viina ne Putina, a Rosii”. Nimetskyi istoryk – pro kolektyvnu vidpovidalnist i dosvid nimtsiv’, BBC News Ukraine, 7 June [online]. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-61707862 [in Ukrainian].
3. Thom, Fr. (2022). ‘Les idéologues russes visent à liquider la nation ukrainienne’, Desk Russie, 7 April [online]. Available at: https://desk-russie.eu/2022/04/06/les-ideologues-russes.html; Ackerman, G., Thom, Fr. (2022). Poutine prétend soviétiser l’Ukraine comme Staline avait soviétisé l’Europe centrale [Putin Claims to Sovietise Ukraine as Stalin Had Sovietised Central Europe]. Le Figaro, 11 April. [in French].
4. Thom, Fr. (2022). ‘Poutine: la phase de l’autodestruction’, Desk Russie, 15 July [online]. Available at: https://deskrussie.eu/2022/07/15/poutine-la-phase.html [in French].
5. Popadiuk, F. (2022). ‘Dzhonatan Littell: Putin i yoho uriad nikoly ne dbaly pro liudei Rosii. Yikh tse nikoly ne turbuvalo. Dlia nykh tse prosto sluhy’, Ukrainska Pravda, 17 July [online]. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/articles/2022/07/17/7358525/ [in Ukrainian].
6. Littell, J. (2022). ‘Domovliatysia z Putinym bezghluzdo. Yoho treba peremohty’, Ukrainska Pravda, 22 July [online]. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/columns/2022/07/22/7359567/ [in Ukrainian].
7. Institute of History of Ukraine of the NAS of Ukraine (2022). Zaiava Komitetu Slovatskoho istorychnoho tovarystva pry Slovatskii akademii nauk pro viiskovu ahresiiu Rosii proty Ukrainy [online]. Available at: http://history.org.ua/uk/post/46787 [in Ukrainian].
8. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (2022). Zaiiva akademichnoi spilnoty Polshchi u zviazku z ahresiieiu Rosii proty Ukrainy [online]. Available at: https://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Messages/Pages/View.aspx?MessageID=8726 [in Ukrainian].
9. Rychlík, J. (2022). ‘Špatné rozhodnutí’, Aktuálně.cz, 31 May [online]. Available at: https://blog.aktualne.cz/blogy/jan-rychlik.php?itemid=42755 [in Czech].
10. Rychlík, J., Zilynskyj, B., Magocsi, P.R. (2022). Dějinу Ukrajiny [History of Ukraine]. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny. [in Czech].
11. Ibid.
12. ‘Istoryk Timoti Snaider: chomu peremoha Ukrainy vazhlyva dlia svitu’ (2022). Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance [online]. Available at: https://uinp.gov.ua/informaciyni-materialy/rosiysko-ukrayinska-viyna-istorychnyy-kontekst/10-argumentiv-vid-istoryka-timoti-snaydera-chomu-peremoga-ukrayiny-vazhlyva-dlya-svitu [in Ukrainian].
13. Doroshenko, K. (2022). ‘“Ukraina ne zdalasia zavdiaky ukrainskii kulturi”. Interviu z dyrektorom Muzeiu suchasnoho mystetstva v Antverpeni’, Ukrainska Pravda, 13 August [online]. Available at: https://life.pravda.com.ua/culture/2022/08/13/249972/ [in Ukrainian].
14. Kalinichenko, O. (2022). ‘Yak viina v Ukraini zminiuie hromadsku dumku v Yevropi ta sviti’, LB.ua, 11 May [online]. Available at: https://lb.ua/world/2022/05/11/516489_yak_viyna_ukraini_zminyuie_gromadsku.html [in Ukrainian].
15. Guaino, H. (2022). Nous marchons vers la guerre comme des somnambules [We Walk towards the War like Sleepwalkers]. Le Figaro, 13 May, p. 18. [in French].
16. Girard, R. (2022). Guerre en Ukraine, quelle voie de sortie? [War in Ukraine, What Is the Way Out?]. Le Figaro, 31 May, p. 17. [in French].
17. ‘Rosiia prosuvaie naratyvy propahandy cherez loialnykh zakhidnykh ekspertiv’ (2022). Detektor Media, 29 May [online]. Available at: https://ms.detector.media/propaganda-ta-vplivi/post/29582/2022-05-29-rosiya-prosuvaie-naratyvy-propagandy-cherez-loyalnykh-zakhidnykh-ekspertiv/ [in Ukrainian].
18. ‘Orban: Ukraina maie pravo zakhyshchatysia, navit yakshcho bukmekery ne daiut velykykh shansiv’ (2022). Yevropeiska Pravda, 10 June [online]. Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/06/10/7140982/ [in Ukrainian].
19. ‘Kliuchovyi propahandyst Orbana pryrivniav Ukrainu do natsystskoi Nimechchyny’ (2022). Yevropeiska Pravda, 29 May [online]. Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/news/2022/05/29/7140237/ [in Ukrainian].
20. ‘Premier Bolharii rozpoviv pro vplyv Rosii v kraini ta pidryvnu robotu posolstva RF’ (2022). Ukrainska Pravda, 28 July [online]. Available at: https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2022/07/28/7360751/ [in Ukrainian].